Breeders’ Cup Redux

So here it is, a little more than 72 hours out from post time for the Breeders’ Cup, and I haven’t written a thing about it.

It would be silly of me to pore through past performances and hazard handicapping guesses.

I can’t write about what’s going on on the backstretch or in the morning, because I’m not there.

Besides, the blogosphere and Twitterverse (God, I hate both of those words) and the websites of mainstream media are alight with electronic updates that appear quite literally by the minute.

So, by way of explanation and perhaps to ward off losing my Thoroughbred blogging license for dereliction of Breeders’ Cup duty, I figured I’d write a post about the Big Event out west this weekend.

And then—oops!—I realized that I wrote it last year.

I’d sketched out a few ideas in my head earlier today…and there they all were, posted a year ago. Replace Ginger Punch with Sara Louise, Wait A While with Forever Together, Belmont with Aqueduct…and you pretty much get exactly what I’d have written today….if I hadn’t looked back to see what I’d written last year.

So then I started to think, maybe I’m just by turns indifferent and irritated about it because it’s all the way out in California and I can’t go; and because lots of my friends are there; and because here I am, in gloomy grey Brooklyn, while they’re all frolicking—OK, and working–in sunny Arcadia. Arcadia! Arcadia, with its classically lyrical implications. Brooklyn’s–and Aqueduct’s–implications are neither classical, nor lyrical. Maybe it’s such sour grapes.

So what if it the Breeders’ Cup were at Belmont this year? Would I be more excited? Would I be writing feverishly about it, trying desperately (and likely in vain) to find some morsel of story not covered ad nauseam elsewhere?

Maybe. But I might also be even crankier, because although some of my favorite horses would be running less than 30, and not 3,000, miles from me, I still wouldn’t be able to see them, because they’d be running on Friday, while I’m at work.

True, I’d be less concerned about some horse swooping in to win on an unusual surface and capturing fluky end of year honors. And true, I’d lose the disdain for holding the event at the same track for two years in a row.

But I might be even grumpier, because instead of clearing my Saturday in anticipation of a great day (singular) at the races, at one of my favorite tracks, at which equine stars of all sorts would turn out…I’d plod through my Friday, knowing that a short distance away, some of my favorites would be running, and I wouldn’t be able to watch them. Though they’d be only 20 miles away, for all the good it would do me, they had might as well be in…Arcadia.

6 thoughts on “Breeders’ Cup Redux

  1. Cheer up. Kathy and I decided not to go this year. We are focusing on next year at Churchill, with a REAL dirt track!! It'll be here before you know it. Now, on the minus side, I went to Santa Anita for the BC a few years ago, and it sure was a nice place… 85 degrees, warm,….

  2. If misery loves company…I will be joining you in the gloom-n-doom BC event 2009.We can only hope the winners of Breeders Cup events also have solid credentials on dirt tracks.These diverse racing efforts that will solidify the horses' position for the American Eclipse Awards, and not muddy the picture.Anything less will be a disappointment and a lesson the Breeders Cup Ltd. should learn from.

  3. I'm still not sure who is going to be in what race LOL. So maybe once the final nominations are out I can get more excited…..but probably not 😉

  4. Ya' know, T., recently I was wallowing around with the same mindset. All I was reading were all the great horses that would NOT be there. The result was BC apathy.Then …I heard snippets of excitement from other fans. Turf writers that loathed the idea of another Pro-Ride BC actually became enthusiastic. No matter how you shape it, cut it, slice it, dice it, throw it up in the air and toss it around like a basketball – it's looking like a couple of great days of racing [and wagering].And I'm with you – the 2 day format makes me a little itchy. But being a fan requires a little creativity and/or sacrifice. Friday I'm working and shuttling back and forth to the airport, but I assure you, I will have a pocketful of wagers and the DVR's set on ESPN2 … so don't tell me who won any races when I get around to watching the races at 10:30 pm!

  5. Thanks for the comments, folks…nice to know that I'm not alone!And Linda, while I've been keeping an eye on nominations and pre-entries and entries, I haven't looked in detail yet, so perhaps you're right.Sue: Lucky you. Not a chance that I can sneak away for a minute during class on Friday to lay down a wager! But like you, I'll set the TiVo (if I remember) and watch when I get home. Still…

Leave a reply to suebroux Cancel reply