Equal Time

Updated: This post appears today on website of The Blood-Horse, in the new Thoroughbred Bloggers Alliance “stall” in the Blood-Horse blog stable, and I intended to post a link to the Blood-Horse site, rather than put the piece in both places.

The article that I sent to be published was originally formatted in such a way that it completely misrepresented my point of view, and I thus put the post up here so that what I actually wrote would be available. The formatting has since been resolved.

The history of racing in this country reveals a curiously ambivalent attitude towards its female equine athletes. The Old Gray (trotting) Mare may have been racing’s first equine star, and from racing’s beginnings in this country, colts and fillies regularly raced against each other. Ruthless won the fourth running of the Travers in 1867, while a filly, Sarah B., won the first running of the Champagne.

Of course, the girls have their own races, too, though we sometimes have to wonder at their names: the Matron, oddly named for a race for two-year-olds, and particularly so given that for its first ten years (1892 – 1902), it was open to colts, too. And soon at Keeneland, we’ll have the Spinster, a most unfortunate and unattractive name for a race for two-year-olds fillies, one that does not augur well for their future careers as broodmares.

In September of 1914, the two-year-old Comely raced in the Fall Highweight at Belmont; she raced against older horses, she raced against colts, she gave them sixteen pounds…and she won, according to a contemporary account, in a hand ride by a length and a half.

Later in the century, Shuvee dominated her own sex at two and at three; at four, she became the first—and only—mare to win the Jockey Club Gold Cup, and she came back the next year to do it again.

1986 brought us the magnificent Personal Ensign, whose perfect race record is no less impressive than Cigar’s win streak, and she, too, took on the boys and won, in the 1988 Whitney.

Intersex racing is a rarity in this country though it thrives overseas, as this weekend’s Arc highlights, with the undefeated Zarkava taking on boys and older horses. It’s bad enough that the trend in this country keeps females and males from competing in the same race, but in this year’s Breeder’s Cup, they’re not even competing on the same day.

Three weeks from today, I’ll be doing pretty much what I’m doing now: working. And while I am, some of this year’s most exciting races, with many of this year’s most exciting horses, will be taking place. Working at a school does not particularly lend itself to catching a few races streaming live, so like the majority of race fans in this country, I’ll miss the Filly and Mare Sprint, the Filly and Mare Turf, and the Filly and Mare Classic (sorry, I just can’t bring myself to call it the Ladies’ Classic). I’ll miss Indian Blessing, Ginger Punch, Hystericalady, Backseat Rhythm, Wait A While.

Over the last century and a half, female horses have established over and over again that they are as exciting and as dominant as the males; they’ve demonstrated their mettle and their talent. I guess, though, they haven’t proved that they’re good enough to race on the biggest racing day of the year.

9 thoughts on “Equal Time

  1. And as if to illustrate your point, the way the Friday races are setting up it looks like it’s going to be a better day than Saturday.

  2. It’s 2 great days of racing, and in the end I think it will work. The Friday card before the Derby is a great day-I love going to Churchill on that friday. I like the idea of alot of action spread out over 2 days. I don’t see sexism in it at all. Plus Friday works better for me than Sunday.

  3. Here was part of patrick’s “counterpoint”: “Using a whole day to drum business up for Saturday seems like a great idea.”If that’s what the best fillies and mares have been reduced to, the argument is over and you, Teresa, have won. I think BC did a great disservice to racing by terribly diluting their event, adding all those new races and then shoveling the fillies and mares to Friday. It’s not Oaks Day, I’m sorry. Anyway, hope this finds you well. John

  4. SS: I never suggested that the races be spread over two days; going head to head with the NFL would not be wise. My objection is to using the sex of the horses as the criterion for deciding who races when. Thanks, everyone, for reading and commenting.

  5. BB–I never suggested that you did want the races spread over two days. You misread my comment.Go back and read my comment: “I like the idea of alot of action spread out over 2 days.” emphasis on the word “I”. If I meant you I would have said “You”.That is my preference and since I am a fan, my thought counts. I understand your objections, and think they are very valid, especially this year with such a strong filly and mare collection of horses.

  6. SS: I understood your comment, but I didn’t type what I really meant…my mistake.Spreading the races over two days is fine, and I never mentioned Sunday as an alternative; for a variety of reasons discussed elsewhere, I think Sunday is a bad idea. I think a Fri/Sat schedule is fine, just divided in a different way, so that the fillies and mares aren’t seen a prelude to the main event.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s