I love the word “vagary.” It comes from the Latin vagari, “to wander”; one definition is “an erratic, unpredictable, or extravagant manifestation, action, or notion.”
I also rather like alliteration. Horse of the Year. Hart Trophy. Halls of Fame. Hockey. Horse racing. Hmm…surely something there to wander through? And maybe a great excuse to finally figure out how to insert one of those groovy tables in a post?
If this were a paper that one of my students had written, I’d probably comment, “Nice observations. What’s the significance?”
And I wouldn’t have an answer. There are too many variables between the two sports to draw any particularly trenchant conclusions: variables in the way they are played, in the elements of competition, in the types of awards.
Nonetheless, it was fun digging through the histories of the two sports, and presented herewith, for your observation/comment/derision, are the results of that digging, of my recent vagaries.
We know that there are no criteria for Horse of the Year; voters can pretty much for whomever they want to, based on whatever is important to them.
Hockey’s equivalent of Horse of the Year is the Hart Trophy, “given to the player judged to be the most valuable to his team. The winner is selected in a poll of the Professional Hockey Writers’ Association in all NHL cities at the end of the regular season.” Like the Eclipse, the Hart is voted on by members of the media vote; unlike the Eclipse winner, the Hart winner is determined only by media members.
Sherry Ross is the color commentator for the New Jersey Devils, and she formerly covered the Rangers for the Daily News; she has also written about racing for that paper and now covers the sport for ESPNNewYork.com. She’s participated in voting for both the Hart and the Eclipse, and I contacted her to get her thoughts on what writers take into consideration when they vote for the Hart.
“Although it is not a guideline,” she said in an e-mail, “most voters in my experience have focused on players who combined outstanding personal stats with their team making the playoffs and usually finishing in a prominent position in the standings.”
While I can’t recall hockey ever having as disputatious a conversation about the Hart as racing has had the last two years about Horse of the Year, Hart voting is not without its controversies. Ryan Stanzel, media relations and team services coordinator for the Minnesota Wild, noted that in 2002, Montreal goaltender José Theodore and Calgary’s Jarome Iginla tied in the voting. Iginla led the league in goals with 52, while Theodore was seen by some as having been essential to his team’s making the playoffs as the eighth seed. In the case of a tie, the player who got more first place votes win, and the Hart went to Theodore.
Had the Horse of the Year vote in 2009 ended in a tie, as some had hoped, it would have…ended in a tie, yes? Or is there a tiebreaker option there as well?
Unlike racing, the NHL offers a completely objective achievement award: instituted in 1999, the Maurice Richard Trophy goes to the player who scores the most goals in the regular season. In the 11 years in which the award’s been given, only twice has the same player – Alex Ovechkin in 2008 and 2009 – won both the Hart and the Richard, even in years when the Richard has been shared among multiple players.
Racing doesn’t offer an award to the horse that wins the most races or earns the most money – the sport’s most objective indicators of success – but going back to 2000, five horses who have earned Horse of the Year honors have led the table in earnings, according to Equibase.
It’s difficult to determine where the HOTY winners fell in terms of wins, because all the data I could find is based on earnings; if a horse isn’t in the top 100 in earnings, he’s not on the list. Obviously, there’s a correlation between wins and earnings, but it seems possible to me that a horse could have won more races than the Horse of the Year and still not cracked the top 100 in earnings.
OK, so there’s the Hart and the Horse of the Year. What about the Hall of Fame?
Thoroughbreds become eligible for the Racing Hall of Fame when five calendar years have elapsed between their last year of racing and their year of nomination. Hockey players need to be retired for three seasons, though it’s unclear whether that means retired from the NHL, or from hockey overall. For instance: Jaromir Jagr hasn’t played in this country since 2008, but he’s been playing Russia since then. I suspect that he’s not eligible for the Hall, but the nomination process doesn’t make it clear.
Players are considered for the Hockey Hall of Fame on the basis of their "playing ability, sportsmanship, character, and contribution to the team or teams and to the game of hockey in general." The Racing Hall of Fame offers no such guidelines for consideration.
And here’s where I get to use that little chart, to compare the Horses of the Year that got into the Hall with the Hart trophy winners who did.
|Year||Horse of the Year||Hall of Fame||Hart Trophy winner||Hall of Fame|
|2010||Zenyatta||Not eligible||Hendrik Sedin||Not eligible|
|2009||Rachel Alexandra||Not eligible||Alex Ovechkin||Not eligible|
|2008||Curlin||Not eligible||Alex Ovechkin||Not eligible|
|2007||Curlin||Not eligible||Sidney Crosby||Not eligible|
|2006||Invasor||Not eligible||Joe Thornton||Not eligible|
|2005||St. Liam||Eligible for the first time this year||Lockout year|
|2004||Ghostzapper||Eligible for the first time this year||Martin St. Louis||Not eligible|
|2003||Mineshaft||No||Peter Forsberg||Not eligible|
|2002||Azeri||Yes||Jose Theodore||Not eligible|
|2001||Point Given||Yes||Joe Sakic||Not eligible|
|2000||Tiznow||Yes||Chris Pronger||Not eligible|
|1999||Charismatic||Jaromir Jagr||Not eligible|
|1998||Skip Away||Yes||Dominik Hasek||Not eligible|
|1997||Favorite Trick||Dominik Hasek||Not eligible|
|1994||Holy Bull||Yes||Sergei Federov||Not eligible|
|1992||A.P. Indy||Yes||Mark Messier||Yes|
|1991||Black Tie Affair||Brett Hull||Yes|
|1990||Criminal Type||Mark Messier||Yes|
|1989||Sunday Silence||Yes||Wayne Gretzky||Yes|
|1986||Lady’s Secret||Yes||Wayne Gretzky||Yes|
|1985||Spend A Buck||Wayne Gretzky||Yes|
|1984||John Henry||Yes||Wayne Gretzky||Yes|
|1983||All Along||Yes||Wayne Gretzky||Yes|
|1982||Conquistador Cielo||Wayne Gretzky||Yes|
|1981||John Henry||Yes||Wayne Gretzky||Yes|
|1980||Spectacular Bid||Yes||Wayne Gretzky||Yes|
|1977||Seattle Slew||Yes||Guy Lafleur||Yes|
|1971||Ack Ack||Yes||Bobby Orr||Yes|
Fort Marcy (DRF)
Kind of makes you feel sorry for Eric Lindros, doesn’t it?
One wonders how many of those players not currently eligible will make it into the Hall; I suspect that that the trend of the last few decades, in which a Hart Trophy pretty much guarantees entry, will come to an end. Similarly, of the horses who will become eligible in the next few years, how many, beyond the females, are going to be Hall of Fame locks?
10 thoughts on “Honorific wanderings through horse racing and hockey”
What about Yzerman!! Interesting comparison. I share the same interests. Go Wings! 😉
Thanks, Wendy – great to hear from you! Surprising, isn’t it, that Yzerman never won a Hart, especially with all those Stanley Cup rings. God, I hate seeing Pronger’s name on that list.
Nothing makes me sorry for Eric Lindros. Only Ranger I can say I outright hated. I even warmed up to Kasparaitis & Pilon.
Sad that Ferdinand is not in the Hall of Fame it would help push Anti-Slaughter Legislation through Congress–so many of our horses suffer terrible fates after their careers are ended. On a lighter note, I believe greatness in most endeavours is only appreciated with the passage of time.
I’m surprised at some of the horses listed who haven’t gotten into the Hall of Fame. Makes you wonder.
I liked Lindros, Ian. He was one of my favorite Rangers. Not sure he’s Hall-worthy, but I thought he was good for the team.
I’m not sure, Pam, that political considerations are taken into account for the Hall of Fame…though I guess I’m about to find out!
Who surprised you, Linda?
Both Ghostzapper and Saint Liam are eligible for the first time this year, I believe, so those particular “nos” are premature.
Yeah, Ed, I realized last night that I mis-read the eligibility – that they’re eligible in the sixth year of their retirement, not once they’ve been retired five years. I’ll fix that.
Bobby Clarke would have never made it without Kate Smith.
Oops, sorry for the late response, I was traveling on Tuesday. I guess I am surprised by Charismatic and Mineshaft not being in the Hall.